Microphones, microphones...In Tokyo, voice over people make a big thing of bringing their own headphones to the studio. No doubt it is suppose to suggest that you a.) do a lot of voice over work b.) are really, really careful about listening to yourself. As I have said before, I think this is an affectation which actually suggests you don't know what you are doing.
It doesn't matter what headphones or earphones yo use - -the sound you hear through your headphones is never the same as the recorded sound. And listening to yourself too much inteferes with naturalness. Go with the flow, bro'.
Check the voice over forums on the 'net and you will find there is general agreement among UK and American voice over people as to my opinions.
It doesn't matter what headphones or earphones yo use - -the sound you hear through your headphones is never the same as the recorded sound. And listening to yourself too much inteferes with naturalness. Go with the flow, bro'.
Check the voice over forums on the 'net and you will find there is general agreement among UK and American voice over people as to my opinions.
What really distinguishes a professional from an amateur is knowledge of microphones -- and how to use them.
When I go into a studio I always ask what microphones they have since they usually they have several. And I choose the type that matches my voice and the tone I want for whatever project I am doing. If they have a mic' I don't know, I ask the tech people about it, what it sounds like, its characteristics and so on. If it sounds good for me, I will give it a try. That means doing a test read, just 30 seconds or so and playing it back over the big studio speakers (no, NOT listening through headphones).
Of course, there is also an art to using microphones. We'll deal with that in another post.
Today, we want to look at different types of microphones. Below is a post from Emmet over at:
http://www.audiomastersforum.net/amforum/index.php/topic,5064.0.html
This guy is really good! Take a look at this forum BTW -- it's great!
Emmet:
I tested, A/B’d and compared a bunch of sub-$1000 mics last weekend. All were tested in an acoustically treated studio using a Monster Prolink Standard mic cable (which I ended up purchasing because I really liked it) and the preamp from a small-format Alesis mixing board. I used a set of Audio-Technica ATH-M30 headphones for review, which I also purchased for my wife...Not bad cans, but not my favorite either…Would be a good starter set for VO at about $70. I tested several voices on each mic, as well. I took notes as I tested each mic, from the least expensive to the most expensive. After testing all mics, I re-visited my favorites so I could compare them with the more expensive models.
I tested, A/B’d and compared a bunch of sub-$1000 mics last weekend. All were tested in an acoustically treated studio using a Monster Prolink Standard mic cable (which I ended up purchasing because I really liked it) and the preamp from a small-format Alesis mixing board. I used a set of Audio-Technica ATH-M30 headphones for review, which I also purchased for my wife...Not bad cans, but not my favorite either…Would be a good starter set for VO at about $70. I tested several voices on each mic, as well. I took notes as I tested each mic, from the least expensive to the most expensive. After testing all mics, I re-visited my favorites so I could compare them with the more expensive models.
Anyhow, I thought I would share my results. I only tested
large diaphragm studio condensers, with the exception of a couple large
dynamics. Some of which I had no intention of buying, but I did want to try for
the sake of comparison. I did not test any tube mics (I don’t care for them). I
did not test any shotgun mics, though they can sometimes work very well for VO.
I did not test any ribbon mics and I did not test any USB mics.
Marshall MXL 990 [$69] I’ve owned one of these for quite
some time. In my opinion, this is a good starter mic for someone on a (very)
tight budget. It’s not good for speakers with sibilance problems, as it has a
strong high-end boost (common among Chinese condensers). It has a “cold” sound,
so it won’t perform very well for soft-sell reads. It does work well for
younger male voices. The 990 becomes pretty harsh when used on female voices.
The construction is solid, and the included shockmount works well, though not
as well as others. The self-noise is very high (22dB), though tolerable. This
is a huge step forward from a “stage” mic or Radio Shack mic. But this is not a
great mic, by any stretch of the imagination.
Nady SCM 900, 920, 950, 1000; Behringer B1, B2; MXL V63M,
V57M, V67G, 2001, 2003, 2006; AKG Perception 100, 200; MCA SP-2; CAD GXL2200,
2400 [$39-149] All of these mics sounded essentially the same, with only subtle
differences in sonic character. None were very impressive. The MXL and
Behringer lines seemed to be of higher build-quality. All of these mics suffer
from the exaggerated high-end, which makes them sound especially rough on female
voices and speakers with sibilance issues. The MXL 2001 was the best-sounding
of the bunch, with a slightly warmer sound. Rumor his it that a 2001 can be
modified to sound like a Neumann U87 for about $150 worth of parts, though I
cannot confirm that. The AKG’s are a load of crap…They do NOT sound like they
belong in the AKG line. My suggestion is to avoid these mics for voiceover,
unless you simply want a backup for your main mic.
Audio-Technica AT2020 [$99] This mic is, by far, the best
sounding $100 mic on the market. There is no shockmount, which is a definite
downside. Overall, this suffers from the same high-end problems as other mics
in this price range, but the sonic quality outperforms the competition. On a
super-tight budget, this one gets my vote. The self-noise is also lower than
other comparably priced mics. Like most “budget” mics, this one will work
better on a male voice than female. It may not be a “great” mic, but it seems
to be a great buy.
Audio-Technica AT3035 [$199] Not bad at all. This mic was
the first to sound reasonably good on a variety of voices without the help of
EQ. Self noise is pretty low, as well. The 3035 has a warmer sound than others
in this price range, which means it works in most applications. There’s some
high-end boosting that, on a frequency plot, looks similar to the Chinese mics,
but this does not sound like a Chinese condenser. This is the first mic I
tested that actually started to sound like a professional piece of gear.
Unfortunately, the shockmount is made of cheap plastic and may break or have
problems holding the mic upside down. This mic, in my opinion, is a very solid
choice for the price.
R0DE NT1-A [$199] This is the quietest mic I tested all
weekend. Does that mean I love it? No. I thought it sounded mediocre on my
voice. It sounded pretty good on my wife, but her sibilance was a little
harsh…Nothing near as bad as with the Chinese mics, but not great. I think this
could be an excellent mic when used on the right voice. The build quality seems
very solid as well as the included shockmount. The proximity effect with this
mic might work well for some voices, but it just made mine sound dull and
muddy. With this mic, I would HIGHLY suggest a test run. I could picture this
mic doing amazing things with the right user. And with the self-noise figure of
only 5.5dB, you’ll be hard-pressed to find a quieter mic for less than $2000.
Studio Projects C1 [$199] A good choice, period. I have
heard people say that this mic sounds like/as good as a Neumann U87. It doesn’t.
It’s also less than one tenth of the price, so what do you expect? This mic is
very solid and it’s HEAVY. It may be too heavy for less-expensive boom stands.
While it doesn’t sound like a $2500+ mic, it could easily sell for more than
the $200 street price. I worked well on every voice I tested it on, though it
performed especially well on deep-voiced males. Again, this mic follows the
pattern of most Chinese condensers…It doesn’t sound great on “thin” female
voices or speakers with sibilance issues, but it does handle these speakers
much better than other similar mics. Self noise is not very low, but not high
enough to be problematic. The shockmount is okay, but nothing to write home
about. All in all, this mic is a good choice for many voices, and would likely
be a good investment for someone with a budget in the $200 range.
AKG C 3000 B [$299] Awful. This mic was the biggest
disappointment of the day. I’ve heard some very good things about this mic, but
I didn’t hear anything good from it. I couldn’t make it sound good on ANYONE!
Aside from the self-noise spec, I thought most of the “budget” Chinese
condensers outperformed this mic, hands down. The mic looks nice and seems to
have a solid build. I didn’t care for the design of the shockmount, though
there’s nothing really wrong with it. Somehow, this mic manages to sound dull
and brittle at the same time, with a scooped sound in the mids. I say, avoid
this one, it’s not worth the $300.
Shure KSM 27 [$299] Another disappointment, though not as
drastic. This mic sounded very good on female voices, but lifeless and dull on
males. The shockmount seems very nice, though not very flattering to the mics
appearance. I would recommend this mic to female speakers, but not
male…Especially not deep-voiced males. I imagine this mic would provide years
of use, as it bears the Shure name. It’s worth a listen, but not very
impressive.
Audio-Technica AT4040 [$299] Wow…Just wow. This was the
first mic to really get my heart pumping. Did I mention, “Wow!”? The sound is
simply amazing. Absolutely worlds ahead of anything before. I liked this mic so
much, I bought one as my main studio mic. I also revisited this mic to test
next to the $1,000 models. I almost prefer some of the sonic characteristics of
this mic to the Neumann TLM103 and AKG C414…Almost. I didn’t find a single
voice that sounded bad on this mic, though some sounded better than others.
While this mic sounds great on females, it sounds outstanding on males. The
construction of the mic itself is second to none. The shockmount does a good
job, though it’s not easy to remove and replace this mic from the shockmount.
But considering the shockmount design was the biggest flaw in the AT4040, I
think I can deal with that. This is also the first mic I tested that I could
set the EQ to completely flat and be 100% satisfied with the results. If you
don’t have $1,000 to spend on a mic, this is the next-best thing. Skip
everything between $300-$900 and go with this or the Neumann TLM103, depending
on which end of the spectrum you’re going for.
R0DE NT1000 [$299] Blah. This mic probably didn’t get a
completely fair shake, since it followed the AT4040 and paled in comparison.
There was nothing terrible about this mic, but nothing great either. Very
neutral sounding. Might be a good choice for commercials, but not exciting
enough for imaging. In fact, I like the NT1-A better for $100 less.
Sennheiser MD421 [$349] If you’re in the market for a
dynamic mic, this one sounds pretty decent. Not too boomy or muddy. I wouldn’t
suggest using this mic for VO, but I do think it’s a good choice for serious
podcasters or voicetrackers. Rugged build quality and decent sound.
R0DE Broadcaster [$399] This mic seems to be nothing more
than a cheap gimmick to entice radio professionals. The build quality is
absolutely horrendous and the sound isn’t much better. The design would work
well in a broadcast setting, but for the cheap build quality. Junk. R0DE, you
should be ashamed to put your brand on this.
ElectroVoice RE20 [$399] Ugh, two bad ones in a row. If I
were rich, I would use this mic as an expensive hammer or doorstop, but never
as a VO mic. The good news is that this mic will stand up to years of abuse and
continue to work. The sound is muddy, boomy and lifeless. But, for a podcaster,
voice-tracker or anyone who abuses their equipment, this mic will handle it.
R0DE NT2-A [$399] Now were talkin’! I liked this mic a lot.
Not as much as the AT4040, but close. Here’s another one that can compete with
the big boys. This mic has a lot of features which would really allow someone
to “dial in” the perfect setting for their voice. Nice, smooth response and worked
well on all voices tested. If I had time to test all of the different features,
I might spring for this one. I can safely recommend a test drive of this mic,
though I don’t think it’s as good at the AT4040 and it’s $100 more.
ElectroVoice RE27N/D [$449] This mic sounds better than the
other two dynamics I tested. It sounds more like a condenser. I still don’t
care for it, but if, for some reason, you’re in the market for a dynamic mic,
this one sounds best. It’s also made with the same build quality of the RE20.
It should be noted that the shockmount for both the RE20 and RE27N/D runs about
$150.
Audio-Technica AT4047S/V [$549] Another diamond, albeit for
a hefty price. This mic is much warmer than any of the previous mics and it
really does sound good. I don’t think it sounds $250 better than the AT4040 and
I do think the Neumann TLM103 is worth the extra $400. However, in some cases,
this mic might actually sound better than the Neumann. It sounds great, don’t
get me wrong. Test it for yourself, though.
AKG C414B-XLS [$799] A classic VO mic. Personally, I wasn’t
blown away. It sounds great, but at $800, it should. It’s almost too natural
for my taste. My vision of the perfect “radio sound” is not the most natural.
This mic is very flat and very natural. It has VERY low self-noise. I would
prefer a little more colored sound. The sound is so silky and smooth that it
works well on any voice, but works best with mature voices.
NOTE: Since I wrote
these notes, I've learned that there are two versons of the C414. It turns out, the C414B-XLII is the one I
should have been testing, as it's designed for voice and the XLS is designed
for instruments. It's entirely possible
that I would have like the XLII better...
Neumann TLM103 [$999] The best. If you look around, you can
find one of these babies for under $800. The sound is simply amazing. The
TLM103 uses the same capsule as a U87, but it doesn’t sound like a U87 at all.
It’s more colored and spoken voice cuts through without sounding exaggerated. I
genuinely prefer the sonics of the TLM103 to those of the U87, at least for my
own voice. Self noise is as low as any other mic. The shockmount is the best of
all those tested, as well. If you’re prepared to spend $500+, save a little
longer and buy this mic. It handled everything I threw at it, with ease. It
sounds just as warm when speaking from a foot away, as it does an inch away.
I’ve been using one of these at work for a few years and I’ve always liked it.
Now, hearing it in context with other mics, I like it even more!
Don’t buy a mic based on my reviews and experiences. Test
for yourself. Test as many as you can. As a general rule, the more you spend,
the better the mic will perform. But remember to save money for a quality
preamp and soundcard or your new $1000 mic will sound like garbage.
How about some more opinions…What have you tried that you
loved? What about those that were just a waste of time?
Emmett
No comments:
Post a Comment